Thursday, August 13, 2009

The Importance of Setting

What comes first, the characters or the plot?

That seems to be the age old question for fiction writers, and there really doesn't seem to be any right or wrong answer. Some characters pop fully formed into an author's mind...they just need to figure out what these characters are doing. Other authors get a fantastic idea for a plot, but need to figure out who's doing those things.

Plot and character are definitely very important. Without them, you'd be missing the two most crucial elements of commercial fiction.

But what about setting? Can you just plop your characters down in any old place and end up with the same story? Or does setting become another "character"? Can it change your plot?

I just finished reading a fabulous historical called "And Then He Kissed Her" by Laura Lee Guhrke. I picked it up at the Avon signing at RWA, and I'm definitely planning to go buy more of Ms. Guhrke's books now. I'm hooked!

This one was so cute. The hero is a viscount who owns a newspaper and publishing house. The heroine is his secretary, who dreams of being an author. After he rejects her fourth manuscript and she learns he actually never bothered to read any of them, she quits in a bout of frustration, and begins working for his rival as an etiquette columnist.

Had this been a contemporary, I probably never would have picked it up. Not that I don't love contemporaries -- I do. But it's a fairly straight forward premise. Cute, but nothing really that stands out.

So what made this one stand out? Easy. It was set in Victorian England. Bingo. Instant conflict and it immediately intrigues me. So few ladies worked during that era, and the idea of a "girl-bachelor" was so interesting that I had to pick it up.

What other examples can you think of where simply changing the setting can totally change the tone of a book?

6 comments:

  1. Jennifer Russell4:38 PM

    The first book that comes to mind is Gone With the Wind. The setting is practically another character in that book. Removing it from the south would give the story entirely different meaning.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh yeah, I agree with Jennifer. The South was a main character in that book.

    ReplyDelete
  3. How about Kipling's The Jungle Book? Can you see Mowgli in Manhattan? Who would he be raised by then? Sewer rats? lol

    ReplyDelete
  4. Amanda Brice6:01 PM

    LOL, Kristen. That would be hilarious.

    And very good point about GWTW. You couldn't have possibly set that anywhere else or during another time.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Joseph Conrad's book The Heart of Darkness comes to mind. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  6. If you think you're stealing my Mowgli Takes Manhattan idea, you're nuts.

    I love books that are character-driven, but setting saturated.

    ReplyDelete